Re: [RFC 00/15] Device Tree schemas and validation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >
> > Benoit,
> >
> > Sorry, I meant to ask earlier but forgot.
> > Shouldn't this development be based on the
> > upstream DTC repository and not the in-kernel
> > copy of the DTC?
> 
> Eventually, yes,

We should *start* there, though.

> but here the main point is to discuss the schema that 
> will be used to defined bindings.
> In that case, the DTC patches code are mostly a proof of concept

Sure; all that is fine.

> using the Linux kernel as example.

Example?(*)  We shouldn't churn the kernel.

jdl

(*) In the sense that *this* Universe is just
    one example from all known Universes? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux