Re: [RFC 00/15] Device Tree schemas and validation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jon,

On 01/10/2013 17:17, Jon Loeliger wrote:
Hi Rob,

On 01/10/2013 15:17, Rob Herring wrote:
On 10/01/2013 03:06 AM, Benoit Cousson wrote:
+ more DT maintainers folks

Hi all,

I know this is mostly boring user space code, but I was expecting a
little bit of comments about at least the bindings syntax:-(

I'd like to know if this is the right direction and if it worth pursuing
in that direction.

The idea was to have at least some base for further discussion during
ARM KS 2013.

I feel alone :-(

If you have any comment, go ahead!


Benoit,

Sorry, I meant to ask earlier but forgot.
Shouldn't this development be based on the
upstream DTC repository and not the in-kernel
copy of the DTC?

Eventually, yes, but here the main point is to discuss the schema that will be used to defined bindings. In that case, the DTC patches code are mostly a proof of concept using the Linux kernel as example.

Regards,
Benoit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux