Hi Will On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Will Deacon wrote: > I wouldn't worry about checking for CPU_V6. Besides, we probably need this > to be re-evaluated across barrier() when we get CPU migration on a > big-little platform anyway (we should probably also drop the > __attribute_const__ for that). > > So you can just replace the "cc" (now that Nico kindly explained why those > aren't needed the other day) with "memory". > > An alternative is to add barrier() between is_smp() and the read_cpuid_ext() > in all callers, adding a fake read from the stack to the latter (like I did > for the per-cpu accessor). However, this relies on fixing all callers for > very little gain, so I don't think it's worth the hassle. > > I can cook a patch if you're tied up with other things -- just let me know. Makes sense to me. Have respun the patch and will post it shortly. Thanks for the extra compiler research; it's been incorporated into the patch description and comments. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
