On 07/12/2013 01:52 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: > Roger, > > On 07/12/2013 11:15 AM, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> Good idea. I'm currently using a "dirty" local version. I'll try to >>>> switch to an officially available version tomorrow. And send you the >>>> version/git id. >>> >>> I updated my U-Boot to the following version: Based on mainline git >>> commit ID 225fd8c. Only this patch added: >>> >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/256702/ >>> >>> This is needed for USB to work in U-Boot. Otherwise my external USB >>> SMSC95xx will not be detected in U-Boot. >> >> I can only test on beagle-xm (which is also rev. C2) with integrated SMSC ethernet chip >> as I don't have an external USB-ethernet adapter. > > Too bad. This difference in boards makes the tests a bit less > meaningful. Is there really no USB-ethernet adapter somewhere in your > department (perhaps a non-SMSC95xx might serve as well?)? I might > send/order you one if necessary. ;) Thanks for the offer :). I'll just get one for myself by today/tomorrow. The one available here uses this driver "drivers/net/usb/asix.c" > >> The above commit doesn't work well for beagle-xm, > > Why is this? What does happen? Does U-Boot not boot up to the prompt? > Please send me a log. The last time it had failed I remember seeing a lot of IO pad configuration errors. But I'm no longer able to reproduce that problem. Maybe it was just a messed up build. In case I observe it again I'll let you know. > >> so my u-boot is on tag v2013.04 >> and you don't need that additional patch. >> >> Can you please retest on it? Thanks. > > Done, please see below. > >> You will need to set "usbethaddr" before starting USB else SMSC will not work. >> e.g. >> setenv usbethaddr A6:66:4D:B0:69:04 > > I don't have a beagle-xm, only my beable. And my U-Boot network setup is > already working, thanks. Right. you won't need that for beagle. It was only for beagle-xm or panda with on board usb-ethernet. > >> Also could you please increase the Linux console message verbosity to debug (8), so that >> all kernel messages are visible in the log? If it spits out something more than what you >> sent last time then do send it to me. > > I added "ignore_loglevel" to the cmdline. But I cannot see anything > interesting that has not been there before with "debug" as well. OK. cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html