On Thursday 04 July 2013 10:14 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > You mentioned that these patches were generated with some kind of awk/grep > scripting. Can you integrate that in an automated way into the > autogeneration flow? If the answer is yes, then keep the header. If the > answer is no, then the header should be dropped. Benoît, maybe you have > an opinion too? Ok, I'll try and integrate those scripts so all this can be done in an automated way even for newer SoCs. > > As far as whether this should go in -rcX or not, my view is that, as a > matter of policy, large changes like this should wait until v3.12. Now, > having written that, I also was under the impression that the OMAP5 > changes weren't going to be sent upstream unless the total diffstat would > be balanced to roughly zero or negative lines. As far as I know, that > didn't happen. So I guess, v3.11-rc it is... kernel development by > diffstat :-( I don't mind these going in -rcX or 3.12, either way is fine. > > Finally, please repost the whole series once you're done with your > changes, as a non-RFC, along with your pull request (if you plan to send > one). I guess I should be the one to take these, since I wound up taking > the OMAP5 addition... :) I thought so too that you should be the one sending the pull. I will post these out as non-RFC after I do a clean integration into the autogen scripts, and then you can take a call on sending the pull for either -rcX or 3.12 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
