* Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> [130625 01:49]: > On Tuesday 25 June 2013 12:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> Rajendra Nayak (4): > >> > ARM: OMAP2: PRM/CM: Cleanup unused header contents > >> > ARM: OMAP3: PRM/CM: Cleanup unused header contents > >> > ARM: OMAP4: PRM/CM: Cleanup unused header contents > >> > ARM: OMAP5: PRM/CM: Cleanup unused header contents > >> > > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-24xx.h | 317 ---- > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-33xx.h | 758 --------- > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-34xx.h | 631 -------- > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-44xx.h | 1557 ------------------- > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm-regbits-54xx.h | 1632 ------------------- > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-24xx.h | 246 --- > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-33xx.h | 305 ---- > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-34xx.h | 480 ------ > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-44xx.h | 2225 -------------------------- > >> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm-regbits-54xx.h | 2677 -------------------------------- > >> > 10 files changed, 10828 deletions(-) > > If things build and work after applying this, I suggest we send them > > as a clean-up branch right after -rc1. > > They build fine, and I boot tested on the omap4/5 boards that I have too. > (I had the out of tree clock data pulled in for omap5 before I did this > cleanup). > > > > > It seems that build testing and then randconfig testing > > should be enough for these if they are unused and only > > removal. > > Right, I'll do more testing and even though they should just boot > fine on the omap2/3 boards too since all thats removed is anyway > unused, I will still do more sanity test before posting them on -rc1. Looks like we have all the pending stuff merged already, this would probably be a good time to post a pull request for these. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
