On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sricharan R <r.sricharan@xxxxxx> writes: > > I hoped to have missed some mails and that people were testing pandabard > support with full support but given what I see, the ethernet support is > not there yet. This thread is about removing the non-DT boot. I see some > contradiction here. Please, look again at what Thomas said in the IGEP thread: > breaking existing support is bad and removing non-DT boot for panda with > not-working ethernet would exactly to that. +1 Even no any USB support on Sricharan's setting. > > Yeah, I'm aware that some extra patches are being developped like the > omap clocks one: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2541331/ but they > don't seem to be in -next. So, again, please, wait that all needed bits > are merged mainline before killing non-DT support (or provide 'mixed' > support like what is/was done on kirkwood) Agree, please don't be too quick, :-) Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
