* Ming Lei <tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx> [130617 01:22]: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Arnaud Patard > <arnaud.patard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sricharan R <r.sricharan@xxxxxx> writes: > > > > I hoped to have missed some mails and that people were testing pandabard > > support with full support but given what I see, the ethernet support is > > not there yet. This thread is about removing the non-DT boot. I see some > > contradiction here. Please, look again at what Thomas said in the IGEP thread: > > breaking existing support is bad and removing non-DT boot for panda with > > not-working ethernet would exactly to that. > > +1 > > Even no any USB support on Sricharan's setting. That's also related to the auxclk. Let's see what Mike says before we start adding back any legacy hacks for it. > > Yeah, I'm aware that some extra patches are being developped like the > > omap clocks one: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2541331/ but they > > don't seem to be in -next. So, again, please, wait that all needed bits > > are merged mainline before killing non-DT support (or provide 'mixed' > > support like what is/was done on kirkwood) > > Agree, please don't be too quick, :-) Too quick? The basic DT based booting has been working for a few years now to some extent on omaps :) Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
