On 04/10/2013 02:44 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> wrote: >> On 04/10/2013 02:39 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> When booting with device-tree the function pointer for detecting context >>>> loss is not populated. Ideally, the pm_runtime framework should be >>>> enhanced to allow a means for reporting context/state loss and we could >>>> avoid populating such function pointers altogether. In the interim until >>>> a generic non-device specific solution is in place, force a restore of >>>> the gpio bank when enabling the gpio controller. >>>> >>>> Adds a new device-tree property for the OMAP GPIO controller to indicate >>>> if the GPIO controller is located in a power-domain that never loses >>>> power and hence will always maintain its logic state. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> >>> >>> In this case it'd be really helpful to get an ACK from somebody else. >>> I have no clue whether this thing is doing what it should, and if >>> you were the maintainer I'd apply it but now I'd like to hear from >>> Kevin or Santosh first... >> >> Santosh gave the his ACK for 1-4 (see 0/5) and Kevin added his >> reviewed-by for 1-4 (again see 0/5). > > OK all in patch 0 how confusing #-) > > All patches applied with Kevin's and Santosh's tags! Thanks. Sorry for the confusion! By the way, I am hoping you only took 1-4, per the cover-letter I was planning to have Benoit take 5 through his DT branch as there could be conflicts if you merge this with Benoit's branch. Again sorry if this is even more confusing ;-) Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
