On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/10/2013 02:39 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> When booting with device-tree the function pointer for detecting context >>> loss is not populated. Ideally, the pm_runtime framework should be >>> enhanced to allow a means for reporting context/state loss and we could >>> avoid populating such function pointers altogether. In the interim until >>> a generic non-device specific solution is in place, force a restore of >>> the gpio bank when enabling the gpio controller. >>> >>> Adds a new device-tree property for the OMAP GPIO controller to indicate >>> if the GPIO controller is located in a power-domain that never loses >>> power and hence will always maintain its logic state. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> >> >> In this case it'd be really helpful to get an ACK from somebody else. >> I have no clue whether this thing is doing what it should, and if >> you were the maintainer I'd apply it but now I'd like to hear from >> Kevin or Santosh first... > > Santosh gave the his ACK for 1-4 (see 0/5) and Kevin added his > reviewed-by for 1-4 (again see 0/5). OK all in patch 0 how confusing #-) All patches applied with Kevin's and Santosh's tags! Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
