On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 02:46:24PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Andrew Chew <achew@xxxxxxxxxx> [130313 15:37]: > > The pwm-backlight driver now takes a mandatory regulator that is gotten > > during driver probe. Initialize a dummy regulator to satisfy this > > requirement. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Chew <achew@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changed the device name of the backlight regulator supply to "pwm-backlight", > > per Peter's comment. > > > > Changed the name of the regulator to "backlight-enable", per Thierry's > > suggestion. > > Thanks applying into omap-for-v3.10/board. Note that I'm not taking the > second one, that should be resent to the related driver maintainers. > You can get that list by running scripts/get_maintainer.pl against it. The plan was to take these all through one tree, preferably the PWM tree because it's all PWM related and the pwm-backlight change will go through that tree as well. Technically these individual patches can be applied as is and aren't harmful, but keeping track of the dependencies might be difficult if they go in via separate trees. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpF9Sdr5CMFL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
