On Thursday 14 March 2013 12:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 07:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>> Though making the rating of the dummy lower is definitely a good >>> thing, so a real hardware device which is detected later can replace >>> the dummy device. So yes, the rating should be low for the dummy >>> timer. >>> >> Exactly. As Mark pointed out, you have already applied Mark's patch. >> I was just wondering whether you can take the $subject patch as well >> with ack from Russell, Mark. > > It can go through the ARM tree as well, no dependencies on my stuff. > Sure. I will push that through ARM tree. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
