On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Wednesday 13 March 2013 07:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Though making the rating of the dummy lower is definitely a good > > thing, so a real hardware device which is detected later can replace > > the dummy device. So yes, the rating should be low for the dummy > > timer. > > > Exactly. As Mark pointed out, you have already applied Mark's patch. > I was just wondering whether you can take the $subject patch as well > with ack from Russell, Mark. It can go through the ARM tree as well, no dependencies on my stuff. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
