On Wednesday 13 March 2013 11:12 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> writes: > >> Kevin, >> >> On Wednesday 13 February 2013 02:25 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Current CPU PM code code make use of common cpu_suspend() path for all the >>> CPU power states which is not optimal. In fact cpu_suspend() path is needed >>> only when we put CPU power domain to off state where the CPU context is lost. >>> >>> Update the code accordingly so that the expensive cpu_suspend() path >>> can be avoided for the shallow CPU power states like CPU PD INA/CSWR. >>> >>> The patch has been tested on OMAP4430 and OMAP5430(with few out of tree patches) >>> devices for suspend and CPUidle. >>> >>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Reported-by: Richard Woodruff <r-woodruff2@xxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Update changelog to include testing details as suggested >>> by Kevin Hilman. >>> >> Ping. >> It can get into rc's but since it is not strict regression, >> and if it has to wait for 3.10 then I can add this one >> along with rest of the PM patches posted towards 3.10 >> >> Either way, let me know. > > I have this updated one queued for v3.10 in my PM cleanup branch > (for_3.10/cleanup/pm) > Thanks Kevin. Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
