Hi, On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:08 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:00:37PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> Hi Felipe, >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:53:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> >> >> Moreover, SoCs having multiple dwc3 controllers will have multiple >> >> >> PHYs, which eventually be added using usb_add_phy_dev(), and not >> >> >> using usb_add_phy(). So each dwc3 controller won't be able to >> >> >> get PHYs by simply calling devm_usb_get_phy() also. >> >> > >> >> > No. We have added usb_get_phy_dev() for that purpose in the case of non-dt. >> >> > I think, instead you can have a patch to use devm_usb_get_phy_dev() here and >> >> > in exynos platform specific code use usb_bind_phy() to bind the phy and >> >> > controller till you change it to dt. >> >> > >> >> >> >> We have dt support for dwc3-exynos, in such case we should go ahead with >> >> of_platform_populate(), right ? >> >> But if when i use of_platform_populate() i will not be able to set >> >> dma_mask to dwc3->dev. :-( >> > >> > do you have a special need for dma_mask because OF already sets it. >> > >> If i am not wrong of_platform_device_create_pdata() will set >> "dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32)" >> and not dma_mask. >> I fact we had some discussion sometime back when we needed the same >> for dwc3-exynos in the thread: >> [PATCH v2 1/2] USB: dwc3-exynos: Add support for device tree >> >> But couldn't get final node on it. >> So suggestions here please. :-) > > hmm.. you're right there. Grant, Rob ? Any hints ? > Any suggestions on this ? > -- > balbi -- Thanks & Regards Vivek -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
