On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:00:37PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > Hi Felipe, > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 08:53:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote: > >> >> Moreover, SoCs having multiple dwc3 controllers will have multiple > >> >> PHYs, which eventually be added using usb_add_phy_dev(), and not > >> >> using usb_add_phy(). So each dwc3 controller won't be able to > >> >> get PHYs by simply calling devm_usb_get_phy() also. > >> > > >> > No. We have added usb_get_phy_dev() for that purpose in the case of non-dt. > >> > I think, instead you can have a patch to use devm_usb_get_phy_dev() here and > >> > in exynos platform specific code use usb_bind_phy() to bind the phy and > >> > controller till you change it to dt. > >> > > >> > >> We have dt support for dwc3-exynos, in such case we should go ahead with > >> of_platform_populate(), right ? > >> But if when i use of_platform_populate() i will not be able to set > >> dma_mask to dwc3->dev. :-( > > > > do you have a special need for dma_mask because OF already sets it. > > > If i am not wrong of_platform_device_create_pdata() will set > "dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32)" > and not dma_mask. > I fact we had some discussion sometime back when we needed the same > for dwc3-exynos in the thread: > [PATCH v2 1/2] USB: dwc3-exynos: Add support for device tree > > But couldn't get final node on it. > So suggestions here please. :-) hmm.. you're right there. Grant, Rob ? Any hints ? -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
