On 02/19/2013 06:36 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:08:08PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote: >> >> On 02/15/2013 01:53 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >>> >>>> I imagine one of the biggest issues is GPMC's dependency on >>>> hwmod code. Can anyone shed some light on how to handle this? >>> >>> What dependency is this? I'm not aware of any GPMC dependency to hwmod; >>> there shouldn't be any. >> >> If Ezequiel is referring to the code in omap_gpmc_init() that is looking >> up the hwmod struct for gpmc, then this not a dependency. This function >> should remain in mach-omap2/gpmc.c and not be moved into drivers/. > > Yes, I was referring to that code. > >> Eventually once we have migrated to DT, this function will be removed >> altogether. >> > > Mmm, I see. So I might try to move GPMC and friends to drivers/memory > keeping the hwmod code inside mach-omap2. > > I already did a few tests and I **think** that with a little luck > we can have a not-so-intrusive patch that moves GPMC. > > @Jon: Do you think it's worth the effort? Yes absolutely! We want all the drivers out of mach-omap2. So that would be great. Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
