On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 05:18:48PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 02:15:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Uh, no. Think about this for a minute - we want bug fixes backporting, > > we don't want to be putting process blockers in the way of that > > especially not in the cases where fixes apply to all the stable kernels > > that are currently active. > then omit the # v3.x, v3.y part, but Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx should > still be there Oh, yes - that's needed. Sorry, I thought it was the v3.x bit you were complaining was missing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
