Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 02:15:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 04:57:38PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:15:20PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > It's perfectly OK to omit this unless there's an awareness that the > > > backport won't work on some kernels. > > > that's not what Greg says, but fair enough. Won't discuss it... > > Uh, no. Think about this for a minute - we want bug fixes backporting, > we don't want to be putting process blockers in the way of that > especially not in the cases where fixes apply to all the stable kernels > that are currently active. then omit the # v3.x, v3.y part, but Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx should still be there -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
