On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 04:57:38PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:15:20PM +0900, Mark Brown wrote: > > It's perfectly OK to omit this unless there's an awareness that the > > backport won't work on some kernels. > that's not what Greg says, but fair enough. Won't discuss it... Uh, no. Think about this for a minute - we want bug fixes backporting, we don't want to be putting process blockers in the way of that especially not in the cases where fixes apply to all the stable kernels that are currently active.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
