On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:21:33AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:26:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi > > > > I'm not actually seeing anything terribly problematic here, though the > > > regulator-name properties should really be removed as they're fairly > > > useless and seem to be missing the point of having the property. > > > Just looking at this now. > > > The regulator-name property is used to populate constrains->name. Are > > you sure you still want them all removed? > > Yes, of course. There's no way that a generic .dtsi used for any > possible board could come up with a sensible value. So how should constrains->name be populated then? Would you prefer regulator-names moved to the .dts file(s), or something else? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
