On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 12:36:48, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 17:08:06, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:27:36AM +0000, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 15:29:36, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > > > Every regulator here has a rather large voltage range specified with no > > > > consumers added. Are you sure these voltage ranges make sense in your > > > > design and you've not just cut'n'pasted the entire voltage range that > > > > your regulator supports without reference to what your board can do? > > > > > tps65217.dtsi is a generic file to be used by the SoCs so these constraints > > > were taken from the regulator itself. SoC specific limits can be added in > > > SoC specific .dts file to tighten the constraints to require limit. I have > > > tested the driver with this approach. > > > > No, this is not a sane approach. You've no idea if any of these > > settings are safe or sane for the board. Boards should enable things > > they know are safe, not remove those they know are broken. > > > > Unsterstood, I will send v2 with constraints updated. > By the way, if we look at all the regulator added (DT supported) till now have the similar problem. arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi arch/arm/boot/dts/twl4030.dtsi arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi arch/arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi Regards AnilKumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
