On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 01:23:50PM +0000, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > By the way, if we look at all the regulator added (DT supported) till now have > the similar problem. > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi This is fine - the SoC contains integrated regulators which supply other bits of the Soc so we can be confident that the hookup is good just based on the silicon. > arch/arm/boot/dts/twl4030.dtsi > arch/arm/boot/dts/twl6030.dtsi These appear to have similar issues and should be fixed, at least as far as the voltage ranges go. > arch/arm/boot/dts/db8500.dtsi I'm not actually seeing anything terribly problematic here, though the regulator-name properties should really be removed as they're fairly useless and seem to be missing the point of having the property.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
