Hi Jon, On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 18:52:55, Hunter, Jon wrote: > On 06/14/2012 02:03 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote: > >> If the clk handle for the gpmc is passed to the gpmc driver, then there > >> is no reason why the driver cannot do this. > > > > I believe passing clk details through platform data is an abuse of > > clock framework. > > Why? You currently have a global variable storing the clock handle. It > can be quite common for drivers to know the clock frequencies of their > functional clocks. How else can drivers calculate timings? Please see Russell King's comments, [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/27634 [2] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg05365.html Regards Afzal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
