On 06/14/2012 02:03 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 20:21:50, Hunter, Jon wrote: > >> If the clk handle for the gpmc is passed to the gpmc driver, then there >> is no reason why the driver cannot do this. > > I believe passing clk details through platform data is an abuse of > clock framework. Why? You currently have a global variable storing the clock handle. It can be quite common for drivers to know the clock frequencies of their functional clocks. How else can drivers calculate timings? Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
