On Thu, 24 May 2012, Menon, Nishanth wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 18 May 2012, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > > >> From: Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@xxxxxx> > >> > >> If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized > >> to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode > >> and wait on idlest. > >> > >> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> > >> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@xxxxxx> > > > > Did you intend to add your Signed-off-by: to this patch? > > Other than forwarding the patch over(since it seems to have slipped > through the fingers of folks monitoring the product trees), I have had > no other contributions to the patch. Okay. As I understand it, the maintainers above me would like Signed-off-by:s from the entire submission patch, even if there are no contributions to the patch itself. So please let me know if it's okay for me to add your S-o-b. - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
