On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Nishanth > > On Fri, 18 May 2012, Nishanth Menon wrote: > >> From: Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@xxxxxx> >> >> If the dpll is already locked, code can be optimized >> to return much earlier than doing redundent set of lock mode >> and wait on idlest. >> >> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@xxxxxx> >> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Signed-off-by: Vikram Pandita <vikram.pandita@xxxxxx> > > Did you intend to add your Signed-off-by: to this patch? Other than forwarding the patch over(since it seems to have slipped through the fingers of folks monitoring the product trees), I have had no other contributions to the patch. > Also, just FYI, no need to add the Cc: lines for the mailing lists in the > bottom of the patch description. > Thanks. point taken. will take care of that in future patches. Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
