On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:52:18PM +0100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:17 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > > But in order to do so, I need the changes that Afzal has submitted > > (in particular [3]). Those changes (and as a consequence, my new patch) > > won't hit 3.5. > > > > So, when Afzal's patches are pushed, I'll submit a new, single MTD patch. > > But this is not going to happen this merge window as I understood, may > be not even the next one. We need to make UBIFS happy sooner than that, > I think. So may be we go forward with your original patch? I'm OK with this too, as the patches are ready and tested. The MTD patch is [2], it depends on [1] which has been pushed, then dropped by Tony. Do you need me to repost [2] ? Tony, sorry to backpedal on this: would you re-push patch [1], if indeed Afzal's patches are not going to be merged soon ? In the meantime, I can prepare a patch on top of Afzal's to have a smooth transition w.r.t BCH support. What do you think ? Best Regards, -- Ivan [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-April/040965.html [2] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2012-April/041020.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
