On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 19:45 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 04:52:18PM +0100, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 17:17 +0200, Ivan Djelic wrote: > > > But in order to do so, I need the changes that Afzal has submitted > > > (in particular [3]). Those changes (and as a consequence, my new patch) > > > won't hit 3.5. > > > > > > So, when Afzal's patches are pushed, I'll submit a new, single MTD patch. > > > > But this is not going to happen this merge window as I understood, may > > be not even the next one. We need to make UBIFS happy sooner than that, > > I think. So may be we go forward with your original patch? > > I'm OK with this too, as the patches are ready and tested. > The MTD patch is [2], it depends on [1] which has been pushed, then dropped by Tony. > Do you need me to repost [2] ? > > Tony, sorry to backpedal on this: would you re-push patch [1], if indeed Afzal's patches > are not going to be merged soon ? In the meantime, I can prepare a patch on top of Afzal's to > have a smooth transition w.r.t BCH support. What do you think ? OK, since we now have Tony's ack - I have applied both patches to l2-mtd.git. Thanks. I have a question though - will send separately. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
