Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> writes:
> "J, KEERTHY" <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> writes:
[...]
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>>>> index 2edd1e2..d859277 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>>>> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static void sr_set_regfields(struct omap_sr *sr)
>>>> sr->err_weight = OMAP3430_SR_ERRWEIGHT;
>>>> sr->err_maxlimit = OMAP3430_SR_ERRMAXLIMIT;
>>>> sr->accum_data = OMAP3430_SR_ACCUMDATA;
>>>> - if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "sr1"))) {
>>>> + if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "smartreflex_mpu_iva"))) {
>>>
>>> What if voltage rail is different for mpu and iva? I have seen some devices
>>> supports SmartReflex have different voltage rails for mpu and iva.
>>>
>>
>> I get the point. OMAP3 iva and mpu have a common rail. OMAP4 onwards
>> even we have different rails for mpu and iva. I will enhance the checks here.
>
> Rather than enhancing the checks, this SoC specific data should probably
> just be made part of the SoC specific hwmod dev_attr.
That being said, this is an additional feature we can add after this
driver is moved.
I would like this series to concentrate on the cleanups necessary to
move to drivers/*, then additional features to support other SoCs can be
added on top.
Keerthy, please prepare a patch to generalize this to other SoCs by
using dev_attr for this SoC specific data. We can add it after this
series is merged upstream.
Thanks,
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
