Hi AnilKumar,
Thanks for reviewing.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:00 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata <anilkumar@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 23:10:35, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@xxxxxx>
>>
>> Change the name field value to better reflect the smartreflex
>> integration in the system.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c | 8 ++++----
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
>> index 144d118..15907b0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_3xxx_data.c
>> @@ -1324,7 +1324,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap3_smartreflex_mpu_irqs[] = {
>> };
>>
>> static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr1_hwmod = {
>> - .name = "sr1",
>> + .name = "smartreflex_mpu_iva",
>> .class = &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
>> .main_clk = "sr1_fck",
>> .prcm = {
>> @@ -1342,7 +1342,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr1_hwmod = {
>> };
>>
>> static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr1_hwmod = {
>> - .name = "sr1",
>> + .name = "smartreflex_mpu_iva",
>> .class = &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
>> .main_clk = "sr1_fck",
>> .prcm = {
>> @@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info omap3_smartreflex_core_irqs[] = {
>> };
>>
>> static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr2_hwmod = {
>> - .name = "sr2",
>> + .name = "smartreflex_core",
>> .class = &omap34xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
>> .main_clk = "sr2_fck",
>> .prcm = {
>> @@ -1387,7 +1387,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod omap34xx_sr2_hwmod = {
>> };
>>
>> static struct omap_hwmod omap36xx_sr2_hwmod = {
>> - .name = "sr2",
>> + .name = "smartreflex_core",
>> .class = &omap36xx_smartreflex_hwmod_class,
>> .main_clk = "sr2_fck",
>> .prcm = {
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>> index 2edd1e2..d859277 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c
>> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static void sr_set_regfields(struct omap_sr *sr)
>> sr->err_weight = OMAP3430_SR_ERRWEIGHT;
>> sr->err_maxlimit = OMAP3430_SR_ERRMAXLIMIT;
>> sr->accum_data = OMAP3430_SR_ACCUMDATA;
>> - if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "sr1"))) {
>> + if (!(strcmp(sr->name, "smartreflex_mpu_iva"))) {
>
> What if voltage rail is different for mpu and iva? I have seen some devices
> supports SmartReflex have different voltage rails for mpu and iva.
>
I get the point. OMAP3 iva and mpu have a common rail. OMAP4 onwards
even we have different rails for mpu and iva. I will enhance the checks here.
> Regards
> AnilKumar
--
Regards and Thanks,
Keerthy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
