Hi, On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:57:32AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > +Felipe for EHCI question > > Gary Thomas <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > [...] > > > This worked a treat, thanks. My network performance is better > > now, but still not what it was. The same TFTP transfer now takes > > 71 seconds, so about 50% slower than on the 3.0 kernel. Applying the > > second [unnamed] patch (arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c) made no difference. > > And does a CONFIG_PM=n kernel get you back to your v3.0 performance? > > > I am interested in having PM working as I'm designing a battery powered > > portable unit, so I need to keep pursuing this. > > So do I. :) we all are :-p > > Note: I noticed that when I built with CONFIG_PM off and no other > > changes, my EHCI USB didn't work properly. Should this be the case? > > Probably not, but haven't tested EHCI USB. I've Cc'd Felipe to see if > he has any ideas why EHCI wouldn't work with CONFIG_PM=n. Govind, Keshava... can you look into this at some point next week ? Or maybe give us a good reason why it doesn't work without PM ;-) -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
