+Felipe for EHCI question Gary Thomas <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: [...] > This worked a treat, thanks. My network performance is better > now, but still not what it was. The same TFTP transfer now takes > 71 seconds, so about 50% slower than on the 3.0 kernel. Applying the > second [unnamed] patch (arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle34xx.c) made no difference. And does a CONFIG_PM=n kernel get you back to your v3.0 performance? > I am interested in having PM working as I'm designing a battery powered > portable unit, so I need to keep pursuing this. So do I. :) > Note: I noticed that when I built with CONFIG_PM off and no other > changes, my EHCI USB didn't work properly. Should this be the case? Probably not, but haven't tested EHCI USB. I've Cc'd Felipe to see if he has any ideas why EHCI wouldn't work with CONFIG_PM=n. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
