Hello, On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 15:31:52, R, Govindraj wrote: [...] > > - if ((cpu_is_omap34xx() || cpu_is_omap44xx()) && bdata->pads) > + if (((cpu_is_omap34xx() || cpu_is_omap44xx()) && bdata->pads) > + && !uart_debug) > device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true); > } I was testing this on AM335x and realized that this leads to creation of two 'wakeup' entries for UART. One is created by the tty layer in serial-core.c and the other is created here. Here's what I see on a branch based on Tony's 3.2-rc6: ./sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.0/power/wakeup ./sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.0/tty/ttyO0/power/wakeup Shouldn't the OMAP serial just enable the 'wakeup' entry created by serial-core.c? Regards, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
