On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Making CACHE_L2X0 depend on (huge list of MACH_ and ARCH_ configs) > is bothersome to maintain and likely to lead to merge conflicts. > > This patch moves the knowledge of which platforms have a L2x0 or > PL310 cache controller to the individual machines. To enable this, > a new MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 config option is introduced to allow > machines to indicate that they may have such a cache controller > independently of each other. > > Boards/SoCs which cannot reliably operate without the L2 cache > controller support will need to select CACHE_L2X0 directly from > their own Kconfigs instead. This applies to some TrustZone-enabled > boards where Linux runs in the Normal World, for example. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx> > (for cns3xxx) > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > (for omap) Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> (for tegra) -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
