On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> [111213 13:44]: > > > > On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Tero Kristo wrote: > > > > So the patch description says: > > > > > From: R, Govindraj <govindraj.raja@xxxxxx> > > > > > > Add API to determine IO-PAD wakeup event status for a given > > > hwmod dynamic_mux pad. > > > > But the code does: > > > > > + for (i = 0; i < hmux->nr_pads; i++) { > > > + struct omap_device_pad *pad = &hmux->pads[i]; > > > > which is going to check all of the pads, not just the dynamic ones. > > > > So it seems to me that we need to decide whether this code should be > > testing all the pads, or just the dynamically remuxed ones. The same > > thing should be decided for the code in patch 1. > > > > Naïvely it seems to me that we want to test all of the pads in both > > patches 1 and 2, not just the dynamically remuxable ones. Comments? > > You're right, it should be only the dynamic ones. Hmm, looks to me like it should check all of them? Can't a pad be marked with OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP, but not be marked with OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_REMUX? In that case it would not end up on the dynamic list, right? - Paul