* Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> [111213 13:44]:
> Hi
>
> a question
>
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Tero Kristo wrote:
>
> So the patch description says:
>
> > From: R, Govindraj <govindraj.raja@xxxxxx>
> >
> > Add API to determine IO-PAD wakeup event status for a given
> > hwmod dynamic_mux pad.
>
> But the code does:
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < hmux->nr_pads; i++) {
> > + struct omap_device_pad *pad = &hmux->pads[i];
>
> which is going to check all of the pads, not just the dynamic ones.
>
> So it seems to me that we need to decide whether this code should be
> testing all the pads, or just the dynamically remuxed ones. The same
> thing should be decided for the code in patch 1.
>
> Naïvely it seems to me that we want to test all of the pads in both
> patches 1 and 2, not just the dynamically remuxable ones. Comments?
You're right, it should be only the dynamic ones.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
