On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 02:53:54PM +0000, Ming Lei wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 03:27:19AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote: > >> The OMAP-specific parts should be queued up in my/Benoît's/Tony's trees, > >> rather than placed directly into -next. Otherwise they are likely to > >> generate merge conflicts with other OMAP changes that we may generate. > >> > >> So I'd suggest splitting patches 1-3 off into a separate series that Will > >> can pass on to -next if he wishes. > > > > Fine by me. If Ming Lei posts a new series so that everything is in one > > thread then I can pick out the bits I want. > > You mean the 3rd patch is the debugss patch posted by Benoit? > The original 3rd patch is not needed any more once the debugss patch > is taken. Ah sorry, I lost track a bit. In that case, I'll just keep hold of the two patches I have and deal with them appropriately. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
