Hi, On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 03:27:19AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote: >> The OMAP-specific parts should be queued up in my/Benoît's/Tony's trees, >> rather than placed directly into -next. Otherwise they are likely to >> generate merge conflicts with other OMAP changes that we may generate. >> >> So I'd suggest splitting patches 1-3 off into a separate series that Will >> can pass on to -next if he wishes. > > Fine by me. If Ming Lei posts a new series so that everything is in one > thread then I can pick out the bits I want. You mean the 3rd patch is the debugss patch posted by Benoit? The original 3rd patch is not needed any more once the debugss patch is taken. thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
