On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 03:27:19AM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote: > The OMAP-specific parts should be queued up in my/Benoît's/Tony's trees, > rather than placed directly into -next. Otherwise they are likely to > generate merge conflicts with other OMAP changes that we may generate. > > So I'd suggest splitting patches 1-3 off into a separate series that Will > can pass on to -next if he wishes. Fine by me. If Ming Lei posts a new series so that everything is in one thread then I can pick out the bits I want. Cheers, Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
