On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:52:05PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > regulator = <®ulator1>,<®ulator2>; > regulator-names = "supply1","supply2"; > }; This syntax is really painful - we're relying on keeping two arrays in sync which isn't good for legibility or robustness. I'd expect something like having a property with the supply name referencing the regulator node concerned like: dbvdd = <®ulator1>; dcvdd = <®ulator2>; or something. Keeping the two arrays separate doesn't seem great. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html