[...]
>
> >> @@ -1494,33 +1490,31 @@ void omap2_gpio_resume_after_idle(void)
> >> void omap_gpio_save_context(void)
> >> {
> >> struct gpio_bank *bank;
> >> - int i = 0;
> >>
> >> list_for_each_entry(bank,&omap_gpio_list, node) {
> >> - i++;
> >>
> >> if (!bank->loses_context)
> >> continue;
> >>
> >> - gpio_context[i].irqenable1 =
> >> + bank->context.irqenable1 =
> >> __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE1);
> >> - gpio_context[i].irqenable2 =
> >> + bank->context.irqenable2 =
> >> __raw_readl(bank->base + OMAP24XX_GPIO_IRQENABLE2);
> >
> > The context restore procedure should be done carefully. For instance
> > IRQ enabled register should be restored last to avoid any spurious
> > interrupts.
>
> For the sake of clean, easy-to-review patches, this kind of functional
> change should be a separate patch.
>
> The goal of $SUBJECT patch is simply to move the context struct into the
> bank struct, not change the order of the save restore.
>
> Any changing of the order of save/restore should be in a dedicated patch
> with a descriptive changelog since that is changing behavior of the code.
Ok.
>
> Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
