On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 07:25:32PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > isn't this all the same as claiming the regulator but never actually > using the regulator APIs ? I mean, you could add the regulator, then on > smartreflex code, regulator_get(), but when it gets to get/set voltage, > you use the omap_*() functions instead of regulator_*(). That wasn't what I got from the patches but it also sounds like a bad idea. Why go around the core code? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
