Re: [PATCH 3/5] arm: omap: usb: device name change for the clk names of usbhs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/12/11 13:49, Premi, Sanjeev wrote:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
>> Munegowda, Keshava
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 7:35 PM
>> To: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Munegowda, Keshava; Balbi, Felipe; Gadiyar, Anand; 
>> parthab@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm: omap: usb: device name change for 
>> the clk names of usbhs
> [snip]...[snip]
>
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c
>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>>  #include <plat/usb.h>
>>  
>> -#define USBHS_DRIVER_NAME	"usbhs-omap"
>> +#define USBHS_DRIVER_NAME	"usbhs_omap"
>>  #define OMAP_EHCI_DEVICE	"ehci-omap"
>>  #define OMAP_OHCI_DEVICE	"ohci-omap3"
>
> [sp] Shouldn't we be consistent in using minus/dash and
>      underscore in the device names?

Also, can't we avoid once again changing the clock names
(at least for a while...)?
Is that really necessary? Can't hwmod use current clock names?
Because, Linus is sooo happy each time he sees that kind of changes....


-- 
Regards,
Igor.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux