On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 05/12/11 13:49, Premi, Sanjeev wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of >>> Munegowda, Keshava >>> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 7:35 PM >>> To: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Cc: Munegowda, Keshava; Balbi, Felipe; Gadiyar, Anand; >>> parthab@xxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] arm: omap: usb: device name change for >>> the clk names of usbhs >> [snip]...[snip] >> >>> --- a/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/omap-usb-host.c >>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ >>> #include <linux/gpio.h> >>> #include <plat/usb.h> >>> >>> -#define USBHS_DRIVER_NAME "usbhs-omap" >>> +#define USBHS_DRIVER_NAME "usbhs_omap" >>> #define OMAP_EHCI_DEVICE "ehci-omap" >>> #define OMAP_OHCI_DEVICE "ohci-omap3" >> >> [sp] Shouldn't we be consistent in using minus/dash and >> underscore in the device names? > > Also, can't we avoid once again changing the clock names > (at least for a while...)? > Is that really necessary? Can't hwmod use current clock names? > Because, Linus is sooo happy each time he sees that kind of changes.... > This was actually earlier comment saying use _ as the convention for hwmod and runtime pm. only usbhs_omap uses the hwmod; the ehci and ohci drivers are children of usbhsh and they get the data from usbhs. Hence the older name of ehci and ochi drivers are retained as it is. if it is really needed, to change ehci and ohci driver names , then i can make it as another patch. > > -- > Regards, > Igor. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
