On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:01:40PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Yes, ARM SoC maintainers have to make up some ground. But compare this
to just a couple years ago where the common complaint was "why aren't
embedded SoC people contributing code to mainline", and you'll see we
have come a long way.
Well, code comes in, which is progress. But we need to figure out how
to deal with the increasingly growing flood before we drown in it.
How about we declare the remainder of this cycle and the next merge window
as being only for bug and regression fixes, and consolidation of stuff like
the IRQ controller and GPIO controller code for the next merge window?
well, now that -rc1 has been released, the remainder of this cycleis
already only bug and regression fixes.
declaring the next merge window as the same may or may not help, depending
on if it pushes people to do more consolodations work or just delay
submitting the work they are doing.
David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
