Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > >> On 3/22/2011 8:30 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: >> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> > >> > > Add voltage domain name to indicate which voltagedomain each >> > > powerdomain is in. A missing voltage domain name means that that >> > > powerdomain is not in one of the currently scalable voltage domains. >> > >> > Before you add these, you might want to change the voltagedomain names for >> > OMAP3. I don't think it's correct to refer to the VDD1 voltagedomain as >> > "mpu" since it includes both the MPU and IVA. Probably best to use simply >> > "vdd1" and "vdd2" since that is the historical usage. >> >> Yes, but it was confusing, hence the change on OMAP4. >> "core" is fine and better that vdd2, maybe "mpu_iva" will be better for vdd1. >> Moreover, it will be consistent will all the OMAP4+ chips. > > Calling it "mpu_iva" is fine with me also. > OK, will use "mpu_iva" and "core". I much prefer these to vdd1 & vdd2. >> > > static struct powerdomain dpll1_pwrdm = { >> > >> > These DPLL powerdomains should have voltagedomains also. DPLL1 is in >> > VDD1, I believe. I think the rest are in VDD2. >> >> DPLL1 (MPU) & DPLL2 (IVA) are inside vdd1, DPLL3, 4 & 5 are inside the core >> (vdd2) > > Indeed. > Thanks, will fix. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html