On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 20:39, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote: > Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes: > >> Tony Lindgren wrote, on 03/15/2011 12:55 AM: >> [..] >>> Looks like there's one smartreflex patch that does not seem >>> to exist in patchwork though.. So that one is still lurking >>> around on the patchwork list of patches until the issue has >>> been fixed in patchwork.kernel.org. >> Guess it is too late, but am curious: >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129933897910785&w=2 >> Why has it been dropped from .39(aka archived out)? I dont see any >> review comments to the contrary from any maintainers explaining why we >> should'nt take it. > > It didn't make this merge window because I did not get to do a final > review in time. It has been a very busy development cycle, and I ran > out of time. Am guessing i will have to repost again since the old series have been archived out on patchworks. and I suppose the same goes for all as well. Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
