> -----Original Message-----
> From: Varadarajan, Charulatha
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:44 PM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap3: Add basic support for 720MHz part
>
> Couple of minor comments.
[snip]...[snip]
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.h
> > @@ -365,6 +365,13 @@
> > #define FEAT_NEON 0
> > #define FEAT_NEON_NONE 1
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Product ID register
> > + */
>
> Do not use multiline comment style for single line comments
[sp] Was only following the multi-line comment stye few lines
above...
>
> > +#define OMAP3_PRODID 0x020C
> > +
> > +#define OMAP3_SKUID_MASK 0x0f
> > +#define OMAP3_SKUID_720MHZ 0x08
> >
> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> > index 5f9086c..53fbe01 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
> > @@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ static void __init omap3_check_features(void)
> > * TODO: Get additional info (where applicable)
> > * e.g. Size of L2 cache.
> > */
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Does it support 720MHz?
> > + */
>
> Ditto
[sp] Same here.
But since the code is quite evident, I will remove the comment
altogether.
>
> > + status = (OMAP3_SKUID_MASK & read_tap_reg(OMAP3_PRODID));
> > +
> > + if (status & OMAP3_SKUID_720MHZ) {
> > + omap3_features |= OMAP3_HAS_720MHZ;
> > + }
>
> No need of { } as there is only one line statement inside the
> if condition.
[sp] missed this.
~sanjeev
[snip]...[snip]--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
