* Thara Gopinath <thara@xxxxxx> [110105 08:23]:
> +#define OMAP1_MPU_CLK "mpu"
> +#define OMAP2_MPU_CLK "virt_prcm_set"
> +#define OMAP3_MPU_CLK "dpll1_ck"
...
> static int __init omap_cpufreq_init(void)
> {
> + if (cpu_class_is_omap1()) {
> + mpu_clk_name = OMAP1_MPU_CLK;
> + arch_cpu_init = omap1_cpu_init;
> + arch_cpu_target = omap1_cpu_target;
> + } else if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
> + mpu_clk_name = OMAP2_MPU_CLK;
> + arch_cpu_init = omap1_cpu_init;
> + arch_cpu_target = omap2plus_cpu_target;
> + } else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
> + mpu_clk_name = OMAP3_MPU_CLK;
> + arch_cpu_init = omap3_cpu_init;
> + arch_cpu_target = omap2plus_cpu_target;
> + } else {
> + pr_warning("%s: cpufreq support not yet added\n", __func__);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
To me it seems that you should be able to now remove these
just by adding the mpu clock alias to the struct omap_clk
tables?
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
